Solution
AI proctoring β automated exam monitoring at scale
Automated monitoring flags anomalies during the exam at a lower cost than live proctoring, with a human always available to review. Best for high-volume, routine-stakes exams.
Book a demoAI vs. human proctoring
| AI proctoring | Human proctoring | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost per exam | Lower | Higher |
| Situational understanding | Limited | High |
| Live support during exam | Automated | Human agent, 24/7 |
| Post-exam review effort | Higher (flags to review) | Lower |
| Best for | High volume, routine stakes | High-stakes integrity |
What AI proctoring gives you
Scales to high volume
Monitor thousands of concurrent participants automatically.
Lower cost
No live proctor per session β pay for automated monitoring.
Human in the loop
Flagged incidents are reviewable by trained staff.
Pairs with human review
Combine AI monitoring with human review for higher stakes.
Frequently asked questions
Does AI proctoring replace human proctors?
No. AI flags anomalies; a human reviews incidents. For high-stakes exams we recommend live human proctoring.
Is AI-only monitoring reliable enough?
It is well suited to high-volume, routine-stakes exams. Higher-stakes exams benefit from human proctoring or human review of AI flags.